Deuteronomy 7

Deuteronomy 7 — Commentary and Meaning

The short answer

Deuteronomy 7 is Moses speaking to Israel on the edge of the promised land. He names seven nations already living there and gives a startling command: when God hands them over, Israel must "utterly destroy them," make no treaties with them, show them no mercy, and refuse to intermarry with them. Their altars and sacred pillars are to be torn down. The reason given is not conquest for its own sake but loyalty: these nations' worship would pull Israel away from the God who rescued them from Egypt.

The chapter then turns tender. Moses insists God did not choose Israel because they were impressive—they were "the fewest of all peoples." God chose them out of love and out of faithfulness to a promise made to their ancestors. The command to stay separate flows from that identity: a people set apart, a "holy people" belonging to God.

But careful readers have long noticed a puzzle sitting right on the surface of the text. If the command truly means total annihilation, why does the very same passage forbid making covenants with these nations or marrying their sons and daughters? You cannot sign a treaty with, or marry into, a people who no longer exist. That tension is why scholars pay close attention to the Hebrew word behind "utterly destroy"—the term often called "the ban," or ḥerem. Some argue the phrase is less specific than "genocide" and points to something else: a radical, uncompromising separation from Canaanite religion rather than a simple order to kill everyone.

Read this way, Deuteronomy 7 is less a war manual and more a demand for undivided loyalty—stated in the fiercest language its world had available. The chapter still has hard edges, and honest readers should feel them. But what the text actually commands turns out to be a more complicated question than a quick reading suggests.

Both excerpts take up the hardest phrase in Deuteronomy 7—the command to destroy the Canaanites—by pressing on the language itself: Strawn asks whether the Hebrew phrase behind the ban can really mean genocide when the surrounding commands assume survivors, while Creach shows that early Jewish interpreters, including a rabbi named Yossi in the Babylonian Talmud, were already wrestling with the words behind "show them no mercy" in 7:2.

“If hacharaym tachareem specifies an act of genocide, then there would be no one left alive to covenant with, no survivors to get married to—those commandments are entirely unnecessary if genocide was the only and obvious meaning of hacharaym tachareem . These considerations (among others) lie behind the CEB’s translation. “Placing under the ban” is less specific in terms of what the phrase actually means but is perhaps more accurate for the very same reason. What the “ban” means needs further exploration and discussion, to be sure. And there can be no doubt that, according to Joshua, the conquest of Canaan involved a good bit of militaristic destruction. But maybe there is a hint here already in Deuteronomy 7 and in “the ban” itself—two parade examples of the violence of the Canaanite conquest—that more is going on than meets the eye. Maybe Deuteronomy 7 and “the ban” is about far more (or, better, far less ) than genocide.”

Brent A. Strawn, Lies my preacher told me Westminster John Knox Press. All rights reserved. More from Strawn in Rebind →

“Some early Jewish interpreters of Deuteronomy 7:1–5 also suggested that the passage does not say what it seems on a surface reading to say. In contrast to Origen, however, these exegetes focused on the language of the text itself, not on the symbolic value of the language. Their proposals focus on a portion of 7:2: “and when the L ORD your God gives them over to you and you defeat them, then you must utterly destroy them. Make no covenant with them and show them no mercy.” Jewish exegetes were particularly interested in the section of the verse that the NRSV translates “show them no mercy” ( lō’ tĕḥānnēm ). One interpretation that appears in the Babylonian Talmud comes from a rabbi named Yossi.”

Jerome F. D. Creach · Robert C. Holland Professor of Old Testament, Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, Violence in Scripture Westminster John Knox Press. All rights reserved. More from Creach in Rebind →

Deuteronomy 7 pushes a question most of us would rather avoid: what in your life quietly competes for your deepest loyalty? The chapter's language is extreme because half-measures with rival loves rarely work—the text calls for a clean break, not a negotiated truce.

It also models something valuable for anyone troubled by violence in the Bible: slow down before assuming you know what a hard passage means. Faithful readers, from ancient rabbis to modern scholars, have looked closely at the actual words and found more going on than a surface reading suggests. Taking scripture seriously sometimes means questioning the meaning you inherited.

Deuteronomy 7 sits inside Moses' long second speech, delivered on the plains of Moab before Israel crosses into Canaan. Chapter 6 has just given the Shema—the call to love God with all your heart—and warned against forgetting God amid prosperity. Chapter 7 applies that exclusive loyalty to the nations Israel will encounter, and chapters 8 and 9 continue the theme, warning Israel not to credit their own righteousness for the land. The whole section is about staying faithful once the wandering ends and settled life begins.