2 Peter 2

2 Peter 2 — Commentary and Meaning

The short answer

2 Peter 2 is one of the fiercest chapters in the New Testament. The writer warns that false teachers have crept into the church, exploiting believers with invented stories and leading them back into the very corruption they had escaped. To show that God takes this seriously, the chapter stacks up three examples from the past: the angels who sinned, the world of Noah swept away by the flood, and Sodom and Gomorrah reduced to ashes. The conclusion lands in verse 9: the Lord knows how to rescue the godly and to hold the unrighteous for judgment.

But one of those examples repays a closer look. The chapter calls Lot 'righteous' and describes him as tormented, day after day, by the lawlessness around him. Read Genesis 19, though, and you meet a far more compromised figure — a man who offers his own daughters to a mob, who has to be pulled out of the city by the hand, and who then negotiates to settle as close to the disaster zone as possible. The two portraits sit in tension, and that tension is instructive. The rescue stories in 2 Peter 2 are not really about the heroes' purity. They are about God's initiative — God acting to pull people out even when they are dragging their feet.

There is also a puzzle about where this blistering chapter came from. Much of it runs strikingly parallel to the short letter of Jude, verse after verse. Most scholars think the author of 2 Peter found Jude's polemic against false teachers fitting for his own situation and folded it into this letter. In other words, this is urgent material a later Christian writer judged worth repeating to a new congregation facing the same danger.

Goldingay asks how 2 Peter 2's picture of Lot as a man appalled by Sodom squares with the Genesis story of a man who had to be dragged out of it, while Boring and Craddock take up a different question — noting that Jude 6–19 is strikingly similar to 2 Peter 2, and that most scholars think 2 Peter incorporated Jude's material as fitting for its own message.

“One recurrent motif is the need to be prepared to take action when God is about to act. Lot seems to be a figure who is torn. In the New Testament, 2 Peter 2 emphasizes his recognizing how perverted Sodom has become. But the story shows he has also been pulled down by it, to judge from the offer of his daughters (and does the last episode in the story show how they have also been affected, or been affected by their father’s being affected?). He has to be dragged out of Sodom, literally and metaphorically. And he wants to stay as near there as possible. It seems that Lot doesn’t get it. The phrase “run for the hills” in the traditional English translations is not an exhortation he wants to heed.”

John Goldingay · Senior Professor of Old Testament and David Allan Hubbard Professor Emeritus of Old Testament, Fuller Theological Seminary, Genesis for Everyone: Part 2 Chapters 17–50 Westminster John Knox Press. All rights reserved. More from Goldingay in Rebind →

“The author intended to write another, different letter, but a crisis in the church (v. 4) prompted the writer to set aside the planned letter and to send this one instead (v. 3). Our clarification of the document as a general letter is simply that, our clarification. That the readers are not identified by name or location does not necessarily mean that the author did not have a specific church in mind. The style of the letter is dignified, at times poetic, and embodies several rhetorical strategies of persuasion. Verses 6–19 are so strikingly similar to 2 Peter 2 that the question of borrowing is inevitable. Which borrowed from the other, or did they use a common source? The majority opinion is that 2 Peter found Jude 6–19 appropriate to its message and included it.”

M. Eugene Boring; Fred B. Craddock, The People’s New Testament Commentary Westminster John Knox Press. All rights reserved. More from Craddock in Rebind →

This chapter offers two things at once: a warning and a strange comfort. The warning is real — teaching that flatters our appetites while quietly abandoning the truth is not a modern invention, and the chapter urges readers not to be naive about it. The comfort comes through Lot. If God's rescue depended on Lot being an impressive moral figure, Lot would still be in Sodom. Instead, God dragged a reluctant, compromised man to safety. That is good news for readers who feel torn between their convictions and their surroundings — and a prompt to stop lingering at the edge of what is pulling them down.

2 Peter opens with a call to grow in faith and virtue, and with the author's defense of the apostolic message against 'cleverly devised fables' (1:16). Chapter 2 turns from that positive vision to its opposite: false teachers who deny the Master, exploit the flock, and promise a freedom they do not possess. The historical examples of judgment and rescue anchor the chapter's argument. Chapter 3 then takes up the scoffers' central claim — that the promised return of Christ is a delusion — and answers it with a call to patience and holy living.